Neanderthal newsv0sko6pu4rgk5vv38at1fkqw4t8xfxa1Neanderthal news">Neanderthal newsba9r6f0u4knr1aqym4cmggu1huhgw7n1Neanderthal news

(English → Español) View original
Translators:

While in the seminary library yesterday I browsed a couple archaeology magazines. I think I could have been an archaeologist if the opportunity had presented itself, but God didn’t give that to me (for the moment, I always tell myself). Anway, there were two articles that caught my eye.yfecnvrpxxocaw1ewbj5s6a0hbrlkiwc

One was about maybe the earliest example of Hebrew writing found (you can click on a link at the bottom to “Display Full Article”) , dated to the 1oth century B.C. (forget the BCE stuff, we’ll be politically incorrect on this site). It comes from a hilltop fortress on the western border (with the Philistines) of Israel from the time of David or Solomon. The fort itself was a big find because it gives more evidence of a powerful Israelite kingdom when the Bible says. vxgrd280pqc5018qho9eqe0vtosi0mlfBut the writing is pretty cool, too. And it’s nice to read the article and here the experts say what all the rest of us would too: we can’t figure out what most of this says.5nr8v1p82esyjt5rljqf574jqg9e46f8

The other article was more disturbing. It’s (from Archaeology magazine) about the possibilities of cloning Neanderthals. The subheading of the article is “The scientific, legal, and ethical obstacles”. But reading it, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of “ethics”. ggry5rk5g9g3kwfg8kn4lnt213n5auf2The prevailing attitude seems to be “This is what we’re doing, this is where the study is heading, this is what’s going to happen.” There’s an astonishing “lack of humility here that staggers me” (to borrow from Ian Malcolm). The article tags on ethical concerns at the end, but it seems to me that as soon as the words “clone” and “Neanderthal” (or any other form or type of “human” the discussion should be centered on “should” rather than “can”. p85dd1fd1amvrrulhke9zjv5a9g5y6ibAnd yes, the article is title “Should We Clone Neanderthals?” and yes, it’s a magazine devoted to science, and yes, I realize there’s plenty of debate about this already, and, yes, I realize that animal cloning is becoming pretty standard stuff (only 14 years after Dolly the sheep)…but are we really this careless? For a “Should We” article this seemed pretty much a foregone conclusion.mp21aoz211n7ty05duq8vsm82mf0f076

Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.60k7xukmhhrnq4klnpg2yas4djv7jhkz

(And, yes, that’s TWO Jurasic Park quotes in one post!)4gpl9fngqqfbh7rzv479u97e9m1yijuq

(original) View Español translation

While in the seminary library yesterday I browsed a couple archaeology magazines. I think I could have been an archaeologist if the opportunity had presented itself, but God didn’t give that to me (for the moment, I always tell myself). Anway, there were two articles that caught my eye.

One was about maybe the earliest example of Hebrew writing found (you can click on a link at the bottom to “Display Full Article”) , dated to the 1oth century B.C. (forget the BCE stuff, we’ll be politically incorrect on this site). It comes from a hilltop fortress on the western border (with the Philistines) of Israel from the time of David or Solomon. The fort itself was a big find because it gives more evidence of a powerful Israelite kingdom when the Bible says. But the writing is pretty cool, too. And it’s nice to read the article and here the experts say what all the rest of us would too: we can’t figure out what most of this says.

The other article was more disturbing. It’s (from Archaeology magazine) about the possibilities of cloning Neanderthals. The subheading of the article is “The scientific, legal, and ethical obstacles”. But reading it, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of “ethics”. The prevailing attitude seems to be “This is what we’re doing, this is where the study is heading, this is what’s going to happen.” There’s an astonishing “lack of humility here that staggers me” (to borrow from Ian Malcolm). The article tags on ethical concerns at the end, but it seems to me that as soon as the words “clone” and “Neanderthal” (or any other form or type of “human” the discussion should be centered on “should” rather than “can”. And yes, the article is title “Should We Clone Neanderthals?” and yes, it’s a magazine devoted to science, and yes, I realize there’s plenty of debate about this already, and, yes, I realize that animal cloning is becoming pretty standard stuff (only 14 years after Dolly the sheep)…but are we really this careless? For a “Should We” article this seemed pretty much a foregone conclusion.

Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.

(And, yes, that’s TWO Jurasic Park quotes in one post!)

One Response to “Neanderthal newsf0o6hydk9u30dnemnie6ankenwrfnvblNeanderthal news

  1. 1
    LauraC

    Love the Jurassic comments . . . off to read those articles!


Want to Leave a Reply?

Edit translation
Machine translation (Google):
Loading...
Copy to editor
or Cancel